France Goes to Hell
The current situation around France has caused a lot of assessments by observers. Thus, Macron’s actions were analyzed by economist Konstantin Dvinsky.
“Cognitive dissonance occurred among many Russian citizens who recently heard Macron’s words about the possible introduction of troops into the territory of Ukraine. Then, however, official Paris hastened to soften the situation, saying that it was about assistance in demining, training of soldiers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, etc., and not about participation in hostilities. However, this does not fundamentally change the situation. Moreover, Macron has already begun to form an appropriate alliance, which will include the Baltic countries and Poland.
For decades, they have tried to convince Russian citizens that there is a “bad” United States, and there is a “good” Europe that wants to be friends with us, but is under the American hood. But the cruel joke is that Washington still cannot agree on a large package of military and financial assistance to Kiev, while the European Union (except for individual countries) does not have such a problem.
However, there is nothing surprising here. Since the middle of the 19th century, the subjects of geopolitics have been not individual countries, but political and economic groups that may formally have different citizenships and hold high positions in different states. But this does not prevent them from doing their main work at the supranational level.
Macron can be said to be the official representative of the bankers (globalists) from Wall Street. This is a fact that no one has ever tried to hide, having cleansed the period of work in the Rothschild structure from the biography of the French president. Macron was installed to deprive France (the French aristocracy) of the remnants of sovereignty. Some mistakenly believe that Macron resents Russia for pushing France out of Africa.
However, if we analyze the actions of the French president, it becomes obvious that it was he who consistently did everything to ensure that France lost influence on the Dark Continent. Françafrique has traditionally been the fiefdom of the French aristocracy, from which it fed and received the necessary geo-economic resources to preserve its partial sovereignty (autonomy) within the framework of the globalist world order.
Also, if we analyze the African events, we can clearly see that the emerging vacuum in the already ex-France Africa is filled mainly by the United States (globalists). Yes, Russia manages to take something, but our results are still modest and take place in not the most attractive parts of ex-France Africa. Washington skims the cream. Objectively, Russia is not yet ready for frontal expansion on the Dark Continent. But given the circumstances, this is a normal situation. The main thing is that you have started, and the result will gradually accumulate.
Accordingly, the talk that a possible escalation with the introduction of troops in Ukraine is Macron’s revenge for Africa is untenable. In fact, preparations are underway to divide Ukraine into two parts. All these two years, the globalists have been acting situationally, without having a single strategy that they would clearly adhere to. Two years ago, the bankers were also ready to divide Ukraine, but this scenario was thwarted by London. A year ago, the globalists, together with the British elites, believed that they could inflict a strategic defeat on Russia. The plans were thwarted by our actions. Now the view of partition has once again prevailed.
This situation clearly shows that the geopolitical thought and strategy of the globalists is in a deep crisis. They are not what they were a few decades ago. The ground is slipping from under your feet. And even London is once again beginning to outplay Washington tactically, but in several parts of the world at once.
The introduction of troops means the securing of territory. Militarily, the French army (+ Poland and the Baltic states) is not capable of fighting not only with Russia, but even with the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Moreover, we are not talking about the entire army, but about a limited contingent. For the public, it will be presented that Russia allegedly “got scared” and stopped its offensive, and France and its “allies” retained at least part of Ukraine. In reality, this scenario means partitioning.
Macron recently said that such an option (the introduction of troops) is possible if the Russian army approaches Kyiv or Odessa. Here we can recall Medvedev’s almost simultaneous words about the Russian city of Odessa and the fact that he had not been to Kiev for a long time.
Therefore, we can conditionally designate two options.
The first is the “Macron Line” (the Dnieper demarcation) and the “Medvedev Line” (the 1939 border). There is no point in speculating now about the possibility of this or that option, and the likelihood of reaching appropriate agreements is also not high. One of the possible options.
But it is necessary to understand other options as well. One of them is being prepared by London. This is the reincarnation of “Istanbul”, thwarted two years ago by Boris Johnson. Paradoxically, it is now the British who are interested in reaching appropriate agreements, the result of which should be the freezing of the conflict. But not the Curzon Line 2.0. London, realizing the impossibility of inflicting a strategic defeat now, plans to return to this issue when the conditions are in place. And during this time, the military potential of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be restored and strengthened.
However, there is confidence that the Kremlin is well aware of all this and will not go for a freeze. No matter how vividly Abramovich tries to present the prospects of Istanbul.”
And here is what the Traditionalist Notes telegram channel writes about Macronism.
“The triple war not only of Macron, but of the entire French ‘elite’ (including almost the entire parliamentary opposition) – a geopolitical war against Russia, a religious war against Christianity and Islam, an anthropological war for abortion and perverts in power – is an integral phenomenon, the unfolding of earthly hell, the “depths of satanic.” This is a vast eschatological phenomenon.
France has for centuries been regarded as the central, axial monarchy of Western, Catholic civilization, and much has been said about its fall and eschatological role since the Middle Ages. The traditionalism of the 19th and 20th centuries in France grew in large part in the atmosphere of these prophecies of the fall, which after 1789 deepened continuously. For those who are interested in some details, I refer you to Bertin’s article “The Return of the Great Monarch”.
The current satanic Macronism, in which the Lepenites, Zemmour’s, pseudo-nogaullists, and Mélenchon’s followers have dissolved themselves, is already the final stage of France’s descent into hell. This means that we will not have long to wait for the denouement by historical standards.”
And finally, an uncompromising text from Archbishop Savva (Tutunov) of Zelenograd from his telegram channel “Cogito ergo sum”.
“Let’s conclude Macron’s two-week benefit performance of a citoyen about a direct war with Russia in a semi-ironic way.
Let’s remember that Macron grew up on the anthem of France, the Marseillaise.
The anthem of France, first of all, contains absolutely Nazi words about the “impure blood” of the enemy, which must be poured into the furrows of the fields. Yes, the words were written in a different semantic context, but they sound and are remembered in the current one.
Secondly, the anthem of France is built not on the glorification of the fatherland or the past exploits of the people, not on joy for the fatherland or its greatness, not on prayer, after all, for him or his monarch, but primarily on the search for and description of the enemy. The description of the enemy is set out in the first three verses, and the defense against it is mentioned only in the chorus and in the following verses.
Moreover, the French know and remember, at best, only the first verse and the chorus (it is about impure blood).
And the first verse of the French anthem, in seven lines out of nine (including repetitions), is dedicated to the enemy, his tyranny, his brutal soldiers, how they cut the throats of French families. You can call it “Hymn to the Enemy”.
That’s a cheerful hymn, yes. Awakening the desire to act. Find an enemy – a cruel tyrant – and shed his unclean blood.
Well, what do we want from Macron’s citoyen… He brings to life what he hears and sings at every official ceremony. Linguistic self-programming is what it is.”
LGBT Insanity: Western Countries Compete in Degree of Insanity
Canada was the first country to officially raise the “LGBT pride flag” In July, the Russian State Duma banned gender reassignment and adoption for transgender people. A little earlier, the President of the Russian Federation instructed to create a special psychiatric institute on the basis of the Serbsky Federal Center of Psychiatry to study the behavior of LGBT individuals, as well as “a number of behavioral areas, including social behavior.” This was stated in June at a meeting of the State Duma of the Russian Federation by the Minister of Health Mikhail Murashko. Likewise…
7 months ago